CNN retracts their insistence Trump under investigation.
The WaPo goes to pains to allude there was collusion, but there wasn’t (FISA warrants are usually granted not because there is a suspicion of something factual). So what does this piece demonstrate? Obama purposely spied on Trump in order to try to find some dirt him. Further, it appears from this story, the spying was vast–as it now has wrapped up yet another member of his team.
In other words, Trump was right again. His tweet was spot on that he was spied on. This is a huge scandal for the breadth of the illegal activity.
But, as it turns out, Cernovich didn’t need a ‘deep throat’ within the NSA or CIA for his blockbuster scoop, all he needed was some well-placed sources inside of a couple of America’s corrupt mainstream media outlets. As Cernovich explains below, his sources for the Susan Rice story were actually folks working at Bloomberg and the New York Times who revealed that both Eli Lake (Bloomberg) and Maggie Haberman (NYT) were sitting on the Susan Rice story in order to protect the Obama administration.
As we have been arguing for nearly 6 months, the notion that Trump colluded with the Russians was always a fantasy. It was an unsubstantiated lie concocted by the Democrat Party to explain to the people, they were not responsible for how bad they performed in the election–it was also meant to deflect the real collusion between Hillary and the Russians. Indeed, the Russians gave the Clinton Foundation money after they received a lucrative Uranium deal. That’s pay for play and collusion.
Eli Lake at Bloomberg blows the lid off the fake news regarding Trump and Russians the last few months:
The National Security Council’s senior director for intelligence, Ezra Cohen-Watnick, was conducting the review, according to two U.S. officials who spoke with Bloomberg View on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it publicly. In February Cohen-Watnick discovered Rice’s multiple requests to unmask U.S. persons in intelligence reports that related to Trump transition activities. He brought this to the attention of the White House General Counsel’s office, who reviewed more of Rice’s requests and instructed him to end his own research into the unmasking policy.
Rice should get a lawyer. Lake write that there is no evidence for wiretapping, but as we have noted, the media has already reported multiple times that Trump was indeed tapped. The Failing NYT has no self awareness of this fact it seems.
Journalist Mike Cernovich has also confirmed that Obama’s Admin broke the law and unmasked citizens in a political hit on Trump. Just based on this fact, it’s already a bigger scandal than Nixon’s Watergate. However, there is surely more to come as we delve into HOW they knew what they knew. Evelyn Farkus seemed to admit just that on the fake news show MSNBC Morning Joe:
Powerline writes he’s a Democrat Party hack. To be sure. Pelley consistently editorializes the news to the point that it is not only fake, but an alternate reality. Keep in mind that after Pelley’s sure statements about Trump, he was proven right as it came to light many attacks were not noted.
Apparently the NYT does not think that the U.S. has such a thing as the Administrative State. It’s difficult to take anything from this paper serious.
This is not a parody. It is real. What a joke CNN has become.
As noted here, the media is all a twitter because they cannot control who can write the news, and who has access to elected officials. It appears they reserve that privilege for themselves, and loathe competition. But underneath all this is a despotic desire on their part to not only assure unlimited speech to themselves, but to control it in others. They further reveal their hostility to liberty by now wanting to control access as a part of the protected class called the media. It’s astonishing in its myopic arrogance:
“This is a conservative outlet,” protested Michelle Kosinski, a Senior Diplomatic Correspondent for CNN, referring to IJR. She added, “For the White House, or whoever made this decision, to choose an organization that is not part of the pool and is an obviously conservative website or whatever you want to call it, doesn’t that narrow the message and not broaden it? And what message does this send to the American public and the rest of the world?”
Here is the full transcript.
Here is the video: